July members cap

can we make a poll for this? the maximum members

i agree with the maximum 25 players but as raige mentioned, we still should be recruiting real pros or good players(we can set a high standard to recruit em so there can be an additional quota of 5 only for pros) cause no1 can guarantee that we wont loooooose some good players in the future(even leaders and co-leaders... so we have to prepare and train our loyal players for acex, co-leader and bcd positions...) If we dont limit the amount of official members, things ll be harder to control( communication(some are not on ts3 and skype, half of our players dont even know each other), clan wars, multi-claning and so.. Lastly i think we have to decide bout trainees so fast, ofc we can retest em laters but we shouldnt keep average players on the list as a trainee so we can focus on players WHO have potential and train em.

xElitexBen221 wrote:can we make a poll for this? the maximum members

Does that include the academy?

no just for cap or not, i agree with the ACE and elite, but  dont think the academy will work, we just have 5 spots where people are trained

Just so we're all clear, we have more than 50 members, counting inactives. If we ever decide to put a cap of say 25, what will we do with all the rest? Demote them? Kick them? I think it's very unfair, especially if we don't warn them first.

if you dont have the heart ill do it

I agree with Afklol it would be unfair to just kick them without a warning. So why dont we do a few 4 player ffa tournaments and the 2 players in each game with the highest score gets to stay? But it would be the best 2 out of 3 and it will be in one server like usa or europe 1 and the other would be in asia or europe 2. We would also need a screenshot as proof so we know who actually won

that's kinda impossible pac..

anyway i still think capping members is an error..if we're making 3 clans 1 for cw 1 for exp and 1 accademy why should we cap the members? to let the other pro players go into other clans? it's pointless..

That is true raigekii. but why not instead of putting a cap on the entire clan itself. Why dont we put a cap on each clan subdivision so it would be 25 for cw 25 for exp and 25 for accademy ? So than we wouldnt really need to get rid of anybody but still have room to grow. But if we did split the clan into 3 subdivisions would it not be harder to keep up with it than how it is now?

nope since we'll be all on ts3 under the same banner.. however i'd like to know the benefits for adding a cap...because i can't see them..we can be more restricted ok..but  cap is truly nonsense..expecially if the leaderboards will be based on exp..

i'm not saying to recruit noobs with tons of exp..but raise our standards(even if i think they're ok now) it's the only thing with sense i see... on central clan we should have all the very good players we can recruit .. cw will be for the ace clan and noobs with potential will be in accademy...that's simple and easy.. that's my opinion

Putting a cap isn't going to solve our problem. Improving our standards and methods of testing will.

ACE needs to be capped at least, we never should loose

Never losing a single match is impossible. Winning at least 90% of them makes more sense.

ill make it possible, but we need pros not good people to play, make ACE for the best, and only allow certain members clan war

voted "no"

 if we can have 60 pros, why we will have only 40?
btw,
few players or many players, i dont care, we need just the good ones.

our standards have being slowly decreasing, we need just to be harder in tests.

Origin of the Academy